查看“NGC1052-DF2”的源代码

*号称没有暗物质的星系, ultra diffuse galaxy [https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10237] '''Nature March 2018'''
:*S´ersic index  n = 0.6,  axis ratio  b/a = 0.85, the central surface brightness is µ(V606,0) = 24.4magarcsec−2, D=20Mpc.
:* effective radius along the major axis is Re = 2.2kpc,  M606 = −15.4 mag, Mstars ≈ 2×10^8 Msun�
:*an extraordinary population of globular clusters, larger and more luminous than average GCs in the Milky Way,  total mass is roughly 4 percent of the mass in stars, making DF2 one of the galaxies with the largest speciﬁc frequencies known. 
:*the line-of-sight velocity dispersion of the GCs suggests a total dynamical mass for DF2 that leaves little room for any dark matter
:*气体含量非常低 arXiv:1810.04938 arXiv:1901.07586

* really?
:*测量误差很大，不能说得那么肯定 [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04136]
:*如果没有暗物质，星系和球状星团质量的比靠近，动力学摩擦效应显著,哪些星团已经并合了[https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01812] 
:*考虑NGC1052的tidal效应，改变了DF2中球状星团在相空间的分布函数 （真实空间外围的GC少了，GC在速度空间的弥散小了）  [https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03864]
:*没有暗物质的dynamical friction没那么简单,  core-stalling and GC-GC interactions效应, 让星团掉不进去。反过来，如果有cuspy的NFW暗晕，里面的dynamical friction更强，会形成核心GC [https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05959 ]

* MOND
:*不支持MOND，弱引力场（近似于有暗物质）[https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04167]
:*你没考虑NGC1052作用，符合MOND！  [https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.11612]  '''Nature March 2019'''

* NGC1052-DF4， same group，第二个号称没有暗物质的星系  [https://arxiv.org/abs/901.05973]（还是球状星团算的速度弥散度）